If we compare American and European legal systems, differences are essentially due to the different way of dealing with the culture of security and the relationship between politics and law. Today, that gap is narrowing because Europe is changing its approach to security and, in the field of migration, its political quest for more security also involves the limita-tion of the judicial check and a more formalistic approach to interpreting and applying the law, i.e. two legal solutions that are typical of the US approach to security. Following decades of strong and wide protection of human rights in any situa-tion, States and the European Commission are seeking for a new and different balance between human rights and security and are ready to trade some political idealism and legal functionalism in the field of migration and human rights for more political pragmatism and legal formalism in the field of security
SOMMARIO: 1. La diversa rilevanza del bene «sicurezza» quale primo elemento di divergenza tra i due modelli. Conseguenze per il sindacato dei giudici sugli atti del Governo e per il bilanciamento tra sicurezza dello Stato e diritti della persona. – 2. Il rapporto tra politica e diritto quale secondo elemento di divergenza tra i due modelli. Conseguenze nell’interpretazione ed applicazione del diritto: il formalismo statunitense. – 3. Segue: il funzionalismo europeo. – 4. Elementi che segnalano la tendenziale convergenza del modello di sicurezza europeo verso quello statunitense. – 5. Conclusioni
ELEMENTI DI CONVERGENZA DEL MODELLO DI SICUREZZA EUROPEO VERSO IL MODELLO STATUNITENSE NELLA GESTIONE DEI FLUSSI MISTI IRREGOLARI
BARGIACCHI, PAOLO
2018-01-01
Abstract
If we compare American and European legal systems, differences are essentially due to the different way of dealing with the culture of security and the relationship between politics and law. Today, that gap is narrowing because Europe is changing its approach to security and, in the field of migration, its political quest for more security also involves the limita-tion of the judicial check and a more formalistic approach to interpreting and applying the law, i.e. two legal solutions that are typical of the US approach to security. Following decades of strong and wide protection of human rights in any situa-tion, States and the European Commission are seeking for a new and different balance between human rights and security and are ready to trade some political idealism and legal functionalism in the field of migration and human rights for more political pragmatism and legal formalism in the field of securityI documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.