In his response to our debate paper (Starcevic et al., 2018), Griffiths (2018) states that we have misrepresented a paper on ‘selfitis’ by Balakrishnan and Griffiths (2018) and then argues that we are obfuscating the concept of behavioural addiction. We disagree with both assertions and demonstrate that many of our differences in opinion are a consequence of terminological and conceptual ambiguity.

Selfitis and behavioural addiction: A plea for terminological and conceptual rigour

Schimmenti, Adriano
2018

Abstract

In his response to our debate paper (Starcevic et al., 2018), Griffiths (2018) states that we have misrepresented a paper on ‘selfitis’ by Balakrishnan and Griffiths (2018) and then argues that we are obfuscating the concept of behavioural addiction. We disagree with both assertions and demonstrate that many of our differences in opinion are a consequence of terminological and conceptual ambiguity.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11387/132199
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact