This discussion paper adds to the recent critical debate concerning retrospective measurement of childhood abuse and adverse experiences. A series of recent articles found only modest overlap of prospective informant-based records with retrospective self-report questionnaires, with biases evident in the latter. However, this literature has omitted the use of investigator-based interviews as an alternative retrospective tool for triangulation of measurement. Validated interview approaches can ascertain accurate data using expert scoring that can be used to test both dose-effect and specificity analyses for further research and treatment purposes.
Titolo: | Assessing child abuse: "We need to talk!" |
Autori: | |
Data di pubblicazione: | 2019 |
Rivista: | |
Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11387/138087 |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.1 Articolo in rivista |