Background: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare skin tumor. There is no standard recommendation for its surgical management. The currently used histological analysis are HES (hematoxylin eosin saffron) staining and immunohistochemistry for CD34 expression in particular cases. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique is only used to qualify the DFSP as translocated or non-translocated and is not used as a diagnostic method. The aim of our study was to determine by FISH (as a diagnostic method) whether cancerous cells that could not be identified through HES staining±immunohistochemistry were present at the two-centimeter margins that were found to be tumor-free. Methods: Samples from patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2018 were collected. Intralesional and peripheral (at 2cm margins) paraffin slides were included. An average of 7.4 slides per specimen was analyzed. Firstly, the preselected slides were reread by a senior pathologist to confirm the absence of microscopic findings of DFSP at 2cm margins. Secondly a FISH analysis was used as a quantitative diagnostic approach, in order to find the t(17;22) translocation. Results: Among the seven specimens that included 2cm margins, two samples presented one or more translocations, which were not visible in standard morphology assessments at two centimeters tumor-free margins. Conclusions: FISH analysis can have a new role in defining tumor-free margins. This would reduce the incidence of disease recurrence after resection and improve the post-operative complementary care.
Novel role of fluorescent in situ hybridization technique (FISH) in recommended surgical margins of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: A preliminary study
Lombardo, G. A. G.;
2024-01-01
Abstract
Background: Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) is a rare skin tumor. There is no standard recommendation for its surgical management. The currently used histological analysis are HES (hematoxylin eosin saffron) staining and immunohistochemistry for CD34 expression in particular cases. Fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) technique is only used to qualify the DFSP as translocated or non-translocated and is not used as a diagnostic method. The aim of our study was to determine by FISH (as a diagnostic method) whether cancerous cells that could not be identified through HES staining±immunohistochemistry were present at the two-centimeter margins that were found to be tumor-free. Methods: Samples from patients who underwent surgery between 2010 and 2018 were collected. Intralesional and peripheral (at 2cm margins) paraffin slides were included. An average of 7.4 slides per specimen was analyzed. Firstly, the preselected slides were reread by a senior pathologist to confirm the absence of microscopic findings of DFSP at 2cm margins. Secondly a FISH analysis was used as a quantitative diagnostic approach, in order to find the t(17;22) translocation. Results: Among the seven specimens that included 2cm margins, two samples presented one or more translocations, which were not visible in standard morphology assessments at two centimeters tumor-free margins. Conclusions: FISH analysis can have a new role in defining tumor-free margins. This would reduce the incidence of disease recurrence after resection and improve the post-operative complementary care.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.