The paper intends to deepen the themes of "lobbyism" and "populism", as a typically expressive phenomena of contemporary pluralism, and their relationship of mutual (asserted) contrast. In particular, in the context of the current crisis of traditional political representation channels-primarily, the party one-lobbyism seems to be able to be legitimized as a complementary tool for representation of interests, at a political-institutional level; as well as as a "remedy" to rampant cultural, political and constitutional populism.
Il paper intende approfondire i temi del “lobbismo” e del “populismo”, quali fenomeni tipicamente espressivi del pluralismo contemporaneo, e del loro rapporto di reciproca (asserita) contrapposizione. In particolare, nel contesto della attuale crisi dei canali tradizionali di rappresentanza politica – in primis, quello partitico – il lobbismo pare poter essere legittimato quale strumento complementare di rappresentanza degli interessi, a livello politico-istituzionale; nonché quale “rimedio” al dilagante populismo culturale, politico e costituzionale.
Lobbismo vs. Populismo: la crisi dei tradizionali canali di rappresentanza politica nella società pluralista contemporanea.
R. Di Maria
2025-01-01
Abstract
The paper intends to deepen the themes of "lobbyism" and "populism", as a typically expressive phenomena of contemporary pluralism, and their relationship of mutual (asserted) contrast. In particular, in the context of the current crisis of traditional political representation channels-primarily, the party one-lobbyism seems to be able to be legitimized as a complementary tool for representation of interests, at a political-institutional level; as well as as a "remedy" to rampant cultural, political and constitutional populism.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.