Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is usually performed after a pre-procedural evaluation by transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) or cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Nevertheless, these ad-hoc examinations imply an additional use of hospital resources and time spending. Aims: To investigate long-term clinical outcomes, effectiveness and safety of performing LAAC procedures without pre-procedural imaging assessment in patients with high and very high thromboembolic risk based on CHA2DS2-VASc score. Methods: From January 2016 to January 2023, 227 consecutive patients undergoing LAAC following an optimized pathway that removed the use of pre-procedural TOE or CCTA imaging assessment, were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups based on thromboembolic risk: 94 had CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥ 5 and 133 had CHA2DS2-VASc scores < 5). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolization, or bleeding events at 2 years. Co-primary endpoints were device success, device-related thrombosis (DRT) and peri-device leaks (PDL) ≥ 3 mm at TOE follow-up. Results: At 2 years, no significant differences were observed between groups in the primary composite endpoint (KM est. 24.81% vs. 20.21%, plog-rank = 0.7; aHR 0.85, CI: 0.48−1.50, p = 0.58). Device success was 98.7% overall, with no significant differences between groups (aOR 0.32% CI: 0.03−3.80; p = 0.37). DRT and PDL ≥ 3 mm rates were low (4.3% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.26% and 3.2% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.75, respectively). In-hospital complications were low and comparable in both groups. Conclusions: In a consecutive series of patients undergoing LAAC, a simplified approach without pre-operative imaging assessment showed comparable results at 2-year for the primary composite endpoint of all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolization, or bleeding events in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 5 and those with CHA2DS2-VASc score < 5.
Impact of CHA2DS2‐VASc Score in the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing a Simplified Pathway for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure
Sanfilippo, Maria;Barbanti, Marco;
2025-01-01
Abstract
Background: Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) is usually performed after a pre-procedural evaluation by transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) or cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA). Nevertheless, these ad-hoc examinations imply an additional use of hospital resources and time spending. Aims: To investigate long-term clinical outcomes, effectiveness and safety of performing LAAC procedures without pre-procedural imaging assessment in patients with high and very high thromboembolic risk based on CHA2DS2-VASc score. Methods: From January 2016 to January 2023, 227 consecutive patients undergoing LAAC following an optimized pathway that removed the use of pre-procedural TOE or CCTA imaging assessment, were enrolled in this single-center, retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups based on thromboembolic risk: 94 had CHA2DS2-VASc scores ≥ 5 and 133 had CHA2DS2-VASc scores < 5). The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolization, or bleeding events at 2 years. Co-primary endpoints were device success, device-related thrombosis (DRT) and peri-device leaks (PDL) ≥ 3 mm at TOE follow-up. Results: At 2 years, no significant differences were observed between groups in the primary composite endpoint (KM est. 24.81% vs. 20.21%, plog-rank = 0.7; aHR 0.85, CI: 0.48−1.50, p = 0.58). Device success was 98.7% overall, with no significant differences between groups (aOR 0.32% CI: 0.03−3.80; p = 0.37). DRT and PDL ≥ 3 mm rates were low (4.3% vs. 1.5%, p = 0.26% and 3.2% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.75, respectively). In-hospital complications were low and comparable in both groups. Conclusions: In a consecutive series of patients undergoing LAAC, a simplified approach without pre-operative imaging assessment showed comparable results at 2-year for the primary composite endpoint of all-cause death, stroke, systemic embolization, or bleeding events in patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 5 and those with CHA2DS2-VASc score < 5.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
