Aims Recently, a novel second-generation (G2) cryoballoon (CB) was introduced. Comparative analysis of lesion formation in terms of myocardial biomarker release [first-generation CB (G1) vs. G2] has not been studied. To compare myocardial biomarker release using the 28 mm G1 vs. G2 CB. Methods and results In patients (patients) treated with the simplified single big CB (SBCB) strategy for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), myocardial biomarkers [troponin T (TnT), creatine kinase, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH)] were measured at 12, 24, and 48 h after PVI. Two groups were defined: Group 1 (G1; freezing time: 300 s), Group 2 (G2; freezing time: 240 s). Mean biomarker peak values were compared. To correct for between-group differences in cumulative freezing time, an index calculated as peak biomarker release divided by cumulative freezing time was calculated. Sixty-six CB PVI procedures (G1: 33 patients, G2: 33 patients) were analysed. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all the patients using the simplified SBCB technique only. Mean freezing time (51 ± 10 vs. 33 ± 6 min, P < 0.01) was significantly shorter in G2. All biomarker levels tended to be higher in G2 vs. G1. The indexed biomarkers values were significantly higher in G2: TnT: 18.8 ± 8.5 vs. 32.3 ± 13.6 pg/L/min (P < 0.01); creatinephosphokinase: 6.7 ± 2.7 vs. 11.7 ± 3.9 U/L/min (P < 0.01); LDH: 5.2 ± 1.0 vs. 9.1 ± 2.7 U/L/min (P < 0.01). On a 6-month follow-up (180 days), G2 revealed a significantly higher success rate (20/33 vs. 28/33; P = 0.027). Conclusion Pulmonary vein isolation using the G2 CB increased the myocardial biomarker release index and is linked to a significantly improved 6 months success rate. © The Author 2014.
Improved lesion formation using the novel 28 mm cryoballoon in atrial fibrillation ablation: analysis of biomarker release
Dugo, D.;
2014-01-01
Abstract
Aims Recently, a novel second-generation (G2) cryoballoon (CB) was introduced. Comparative analysis of lesion formation in terms of myocardial biomarker release [first-generation CB (G1) vs. G2] has not been studied. To compare myocardial biomarker release using the 28 mm G1 vs. G2 CB. Methods and results In patients (patients) treated with the simplified single big CB (SBCB) strategy for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), myocardial biomarkers [troponin T (TnT), creatine kinase, lactic dehydrogenase (LDH)] were measured at 12, 24, and 48 h after PVI. Two groups were defined: Group 1 (G1; freezing time: 300 s), Group 2 (G2; freezing time: 240 s). Mean biomarker peak values were compared. To correct for between-group differences in cumulative freezing time, an index calculated as peak biomarker release divided by cumulative freezing time was calculated. Sixty-six CB PVI procedures (G1: 33 patients, G2: 33 patients) were analysed. Pulmonary vein isolation was achieved in all the patients using the simplified SBCB technique only. Mean freezing time (51 ± 10 vs. 33 ± 6 min, P < 0.01) was significantly shorter in G2. All biomarker levels tended to be higher in G2 vs. G1. The indexed biomarkers values were significantly higher in G2: TnT: 18.8 ± 8.5 vs. 32.3 ± 13.6 pg/L/min (P < 0.01); creatinephosphokinase: 6.7 ± 2.7 vs. 11.7 ± 3.9 U/L/min (P < 0.01); LDH: 5.2 ± 1.0 vs. 9.1 ± 2.7 U/L/min (P < 0.01). On a 6-month follow-up (180 days), G2 revealed a significantly higher success rate (20/33 vs. 28/33; P = 0.027). Conclusion Pulmonary vein isolation using the G2 CB increased the myocardial biomarker release index and is linked to a significantly improved 6 months success rate. © The Author 2014.I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
