Objectives: To evaluate worldwide medical practices of otolaryngology centers in managing patients with Head And Neck Cancer (HNC) Materials and Methods: We performed an online survey sent to otorhinolaryngologists worldwide via the IFOS between February and March 2024. The following aspects were evaluated: personal characteristics, diagnostics modalities, treatments, global management, cultural specificities and clinical cases. We compared results between centers in different geographical areas: Europe, North America, South and Central America, Asia, Africa Sub-Saharan, Oceania, and Middle East & North Africa (MENA). Results: A total of 566 otorhinolaryngologists from 457 centers in 101 countries responded. International guideline adherence was lower in North America (45.5 %) than globally (74.5 %; p = 0.005). HPV/p16 testing was less common in Africa (28.9 %) and MENA (60.8 %) versus other regions (92.8 %; p < 0.001). PD-L1 testing was frequent in Europe (84.6 %) but rare in Africa (5.3 %; p < 0.001). Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards were systematic in Europe (88.9 %) and Oceania (87.5 %) but used selectively elsewhere. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy use was lower in Africa (28.9 %) and MENA (64.6 %; p < 0.001). A total of 95.7 % of centers had access to chemotherapy, with no differences between regions (p = 0.236). African centers cited cost as a major barrier (79.5 % vs. 33.8 %; p < 0.001). MRI and PET/CT access was significantly lower in Africa (51.2 % and 5 %), Central/South America (79.5 % and 47.7 %), and MENA (80.9 % and 43.8 %) than other regions (89.5 % and 73.2 %; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The management of HNC exhibits significant variability worldwide. International guidelines should consider the economic, cultural, and geographic specificities of each continent to ensure context-sensitive care.

Management of head and neck cancer around the world: an international survey by the world ear, nose, and throat federation

Maniaci A.;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate worldwide medical practices of otolaryngology centers in managing patients with Head And Neck Cancer (HNC) Materials and Methods: We performed an online survey sent to otorhinolaryngologists worldwide via the IFOS between February and March 2024. The following aspects were evaluated: personal characteristics, diagnostics modalities, treatments, global management, cultural specificities and clinical cases. We compared results between centers in different geographical areas: Europe, North America, South and Central America, Asia, Africa Sub-Saharan, Oceania, and Middle East & North Africa (MENA). Results: A total of 566 otorhinolaryngologists from 457 centers in 101 countries responded. International guideline adherence was lower in North America (45.5 %) than globally (74.5 %; p = 0.005). HPV/p16 testing was less common in Africa (28.9 %) and MENA (60.8 %) versus other regions (92.8 %; p < 0.001). PD-L1 testing was frequent in Europe (84.6 %) but rare in Africa (5.3 %; p < 0.001). Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards were systematic in Europe (88.9 %) and Oceania (87.5 %) but used selectively elsewhere. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy use was lower in Africa (28.9 %) and MENA (64.6 %; p < 0.001). A total of 95.7 % of centers had access to chemotherapy, with no differences between regions (p = 0.236). African centers cited cost as a major barrier (79.5 % vs. 33.8 %; p < 0.001). MRI and PET/CT access was significantly lower in Africa (51.2 % and 5 %), Central/South America (79.5 % and 47.7 %), and MENA (80.9 % and 43.8 %) than other regions (89.5 % and 73.2 %; p < 0.001). Conclusion: The management of HNC exhibits significant variability worldwide. International guidelines should consider the economic, cultural, and geographic specificities of each continent to ensure context-sensitive care.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11387/215853
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact