The essay aims at discussing a judicial method of constitutional interpretation which attracts in the US a large consensus and which is referred to as judicial minimal-ism. Cass Sunstein defines judicial minimalism as the attitude of not saying more than necessary to decide a case, leaving whenever possible things undecided.

Minimalismo giudiziale nell’interpretazione costituzionale. Qual è la forza costruttiva del silenzio?

CORSO, LUCIA
2013

Abstract

The essay aims at discussing a judicial method of constitutional interpretation which attracts in the US a large consensus and which is referred to as judicial minimal-ism. Cass Sunstein defines judicial minimalism as the attitude of not saying more than necessary to decide a case, leaving whenever possible things undecided.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11387/35526
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact