The essay aims at discussing a judicial method of constitutional interpretation which attracts in the US a large consensus and which is referred to as judicial minimal-ism. Cass Sunstein defines judicial minimalism as the attitude of not saying more than necessary to decide a case, leaving whenever possible things undecided.
Minimalismo giudiziale nell’interpretazione costituzionale. Qual è la forza costruttiva del silenzio?
CORSO, LUCIA
2013-01-01
Abstract
The essay aims at discussing a judicial method of constitutional interpretation which attracts in the US a large consensus and which is referred to as judicial minimal-ism. Cass Sunstein defines judicial minimalism as the attitude of not saying more than necessary to decide a case, leaving whenever possible things undecided.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
